Although not, typical public agencies get a hold of it unintuitive as (ordinarily) sex and you will gender are not known
Alternatively, she requires all of these to get sex words and keeps you to definitely (the latest norms regarding) femininity/manliness make reference to gender normativity
Mikkola (2011) contends that sex/gender improvement, which underlies feedback for example Rubin’s and MacKinnon’s, enjoys certain unintuitive and unwelcome ontological requirements one to give the fresh variation politically unhelpful. Very first, stating that gender are socially constructed ensures that the presence of both women and men is an emotional-mainly based matter. This means that we is going to do away which have men and women by just changing specific societal techniques, exhibitions otherwise standards on what gender depends (whichever the individuals is actually). Second, stating you to definitely gender is a product out-of oppressive societal pushes means one to eliminating people shall be feminism’s political objective. But this harbours ontologically undesired duties as most typical societal agents glance at the gender as a supply of confident worth. Therefore, feminism appears to should do out which have a thing that is not done away with, that’s unrealistic so you can inspire public agencies to do something in ways that point in the gender fairness. Given these problems, Mikkola argues one to feminists should give-up the fresh differences to the practical political basis.
To put it differently, feminist philosophers presumably has actually yet provide good reasons to trust you to definitely ‘woman’ doesn’t just pick out adult human women. Alex Byrne (2020) contends into the an identical vein: the expression ‘woman’ doesn’t choose a personal form because feminist philosophers have “assumed”. Rather, “ladies are adult people lady–nothing significantly more, and nothing less” (2020, 3801).